Just One Minute
Balanced Fare: We Report, You Deride

Monday, April 07, 2003



Surely There Is A Bit Of Relevant History Here

Josh Marshall writes in the Washington Monthly about the neocon domino theory for regime change in the Middle East:

When the communist regimes of Eastern and Central Europe fell after 1989, the people of those nations felt grateful to the United States because we helped liberate them from their Russian colonial masters. They went on to create pro-Western democracies. The same is unlikely to happen, however, if we help "liberate" Saudi Arabia and Egypt. The tyrannies in these countries are home grown, and the U.S. government has supported them, rightly or wrongly, for decades, even as we've ignored (in the eyes of Arabs) the plight of the Palestinians. Consequently, the citizens of these countries generally hate the United States, and show strong sympathy for Islamic radicals. If free elections were held in Saudi Arabia today, Osama bin Laden would probably win more votes than Crown Prince Abdullah. Topple the pro-Western autocracies in these countries, in other words, and you won't get pro-Western democracies but anti-Western tyrannies.

To this dilemma, the hawks offer two responses. One is that eventually the citizens of Egypt and Saudi Arabia will grow disenchanted with their anti-Western Islamic governments, just as the people of Iran have, and become our friends. To which the correct response is, well, sure, that's a nice theory, but do we really want to make the situation for ourselves hugely worse now on the strength of a theoretical future benefit?


I would think some mention of our experience with the Shah of Iran would be relevant to this point.

In any case, if I understand the neocon plan, as described by Marshall, the next step after the liberation of Iraq is a settlement of the Palestinian question. Surely this will defuse some of the anti-US sentiment in Egypt and Saudi Arabia.


Comments: Post a Comment

Home