8/22/2003 08:26:00 AM
by The MinuteMan
is doubtful, the Cal Pundit
We were non-buyers of this theory back on July 9
, as was Mr. Belgravitas
, who follows up here
Now, a bit of a puzzle: Donald Rumsfeld's war objectives
, as of March 21, included (third of eight):
"to search for, capture, drive out terrorists who have found safe harbor in Iraq."
So, would flypaper devotees care to explain whether Rumsfeld was lying then? Or have our objectives quietly changed, and why have the American people not been told?
Or, have we been told? I haven't checked every transcript of every Sunday talk show.
IF the switcheroo has not been announced, I don't think "strategic deception" will be persuasive, BTW. I'm only guessing, but I doubt that a few words from Rumsfeld to Russert explaining that the Administration views this influx of terrorists as a golden opportunity would prompt the jihadist equivalent of "D'oh", followed by a rapid retreat by same.
Although if pacifying the country were that easy, it might be worth a try.
UPDATE: By "pacifying the country", I meant Iraq! Unrest struck other cities
too, as this on-the scene report confirms.