8/04/2003 01:28:00 PM
by The MinuteMan
Valerie Plame Wilson - Aug 4
Ambassador Wilson appeared on "Late Edition
" with Wolf Blitzer on Aug. 3. The story does not appear to advance, but on the subject of his wife, we have an engaging extended hypothetical:
BLITZER: I want you to elaborate on what you said, I believe, in Time magazine, that this was a smear job against you, this entire post-mortem that's been coming up since then, including your wife, who works at the CIA exposing her, for example. What did you mean by that?
WILSON: Well, first of all, with respect to my wife, I don't answer any questions. And anything that I say with respect to that, the allegations about her are all hypothetical. I would not confirm or deny her place of employment. To do so would be, if she were, a breach of national security; and if she were not, at a minimum, what they have done is they have forced her to answer a lot of uncomfortable questions from neighbors and friends and whatnot.
Well, that's certainly clear.
The Ambassador is also quite interesting on the question of the missing WMDs:
BLITZER: ... But do you have confidence in David Kay [chief WMD seeker], that they know what they're doing?
JOSEPH WILSON, FORMER U.S. ACTING AMBASSADOR TO IRAQ: Oh, absolutely, and I've had confidence in -- that we would find weapons of mass destruction, weapons of mass destruction programs from the very beginning of the run-up to the war in Iraq.
687, the initial U.N. resolution dealing with weapons of mass destruction, demanded compliance, and it had as its objective disarmament. We had not yet achieved disarmament, so it was perfectly appropriate to continue to try and gather together the international consensus to disarm Saddam and his programs.
I think we'll find chemical weapons. I think we'll find biological precursors that may or may not have been weaponized. And I think we will find a continuing interest of -- on nuclear weapons. The question really is whether it met the threshold test of imminent threat to our own national security or even the test of grave and gathering danger.
BLITZER: And you believe, going into the war, that that threshold had not been met?
WILSON: No, not at all. I believe that we had to be aggressive in disarming and that the posture we had to take had to include the credible threat of force. And in order for that threat of force to be credible, we had to be prepared to use it.
What I disagreed with was the other agendas that were in play that led us to invade, conquer and now occupy Iraq.
Since that pesky "imminent threat" argument reappears, I refer the dedicated to my review
of the most recent State of the Union Address, where we find "16 Words", and a lot more.
UPDATE: "Imminent" arrived sooner elsewhere
. Hey, that coffee smells good!